Search for: All records

This research paper systematically identifies the perceptions of learning machine learning (ML) topics. To keep up with the ever-increasing need for professionals with ML expertise, for-profit and non-profit organizations conduct a wide range of ML-related courses at undergraduate and graduate levels. Despite the availability of ML-related education materials, there is lack of understanding how students perceive ML-related topics and the dissemination of ML-related topics. A systematic categorization of students' perceptions of these courses can aid educators in understanding the challenges that students face, and use that understanding for better dissemination of ML-related topics in courses. The goal of this paper is to help educators teach machine learning (ML) topics by providing an experience report of students' perceptions related to learning ML. We accomplish our research goal by conducting an empirical study where we deploy a survey with 83 students across five academic institutions. These students are recruited from a mixture of undergraduate and graduate courses. We apply a qualitative analysis technique called open coding to identify challenges that students encounter while studying ML-related topics. Using the same qualitative analysis technique we identify quality aspects do students prioritize ML-related topics. From our survey, we identify 11 challenges that students face when learning about ML topics, amongst which data quality is the most frequent, followed by hardware-related challenges. We observe the majority of the students prefer hands-on projects over theoretical lectures. Furthermore, we find the surveyed students to consider ethics, security, privacy, correctness, and performance as essential considerations while developing ML-based systems. Based on our findings, we recommend educators who teach ML-related courses to (i) incorporate hands-on projects to teach ML-related topics, (ii) dedicate course materials related to data quality, (iii) use lightweight virtualization tools to showcase computationally intensive topics, such as deep neural networks, and (iv) empirical evaluation of how large language models can be used in ML-related education. 

Simulations are widely used to teach science in grade schools. These Ralph Knipper rak0035@auburn.edu Auburn University Auburn, Alabama, USA Sadhana Puntambekar puntambekar@education.wisc.edu University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin, USA Large Language Models, Conversational AI, Meta-Conversation, simulations are often augmented with a conversational artificial intelligence (AI) agent to provide real-time scaffolding support for students conducting experiments using the simulations. AI agents are highly tailored for each simulation, with a predesigned set of Instructional Goals (IGs). This makes it difficult for teachers to adjust IGs as the agent may no longer align with the revised IGs. Additionally, teachers are hesitant to adopt new third-party simulations for the same reasons. In this research, we introduce SimPal, a Large Language Model (LLM) based meta-conversational agent, to solve this misalignment issue between a pre-trained conversational AI agent and the constantly evolving pedagogy of instructors. Through natural conversation with SimPal, teachers first explain their desired IGs, based on which SimPal identifies a set of relevant physical variables and their relationships to create symbolic representations of the desired IGs. The symbolic representations can then be leveraged to design prompts for the original AI agent to yield better alignment with the desired IGs. We empirically evaluated SimPal using two LLMs, ChatGPT-3.5 and PaLM 2, on 63 Physics simulations from PhET and Golabz. Additionally, we examined the impact of different prompting techniques on LLM’s performance by utilizing the TELeR taxonomy to identify relevant physical variables for the IGs. Our findings showed that SimPal can do this task with a high degree of accuracy when provided with a well-defined prompt. 

Defects in infrastructure as code (IaC) scripts can have serious consequences, for example, creating large-scale system outages. A taxonomy of IaC defects can be useful for understanding the nature of defects, and identifying activities needed to fix and prevent defects in IaC scripts. The goal of this paper is to help practitioners improve the quality of infrastructure as code (IaC) scripts by developing a defect taxonomy for IaC scripts through qualitative analysis. We develop a taxonomy of IaC defects by applying qualitative analysis on 1,448 defect-related commits collected from open source software (OSS) repositories of the Openstack organization. We conduct a survey with 66 practitioners to assess if they agree with the identified defect categories included in our taxonomy. We quantify the frequency of identified defect categories by analyzing 80,425 commits collected from 291 OSS repositories spanning across 2005 to 2019. Our defect taxonomy for IaC consists of eight categories, including a category specific to IaC called idempotency (i.e., defects that lead to incorrect system provisioning when the same IaC script is executed multiple times). We observe the surveyed 66 practitioners to agree most with idempotency. The most frequent defect category is configuration data i.e., providing erroneous configuration data in IaC scripts. Our taxonomy and the quantified frequency of the defect categories may help in advancing the science of IaC script quality.